1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Riley | Rover |
Model | Kestrel | 75 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2830 mm |