1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 805 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Riley | Ford |
Model | Kestrel | Ranger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3010 mm |