1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2006 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2006 Skoda Fabia is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 255 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2006 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Riley | Skoda |
Model | Kestrel | Fabia |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |