1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Riley Kestrel | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Riley | Aston Martin |
| Model | Kestrel | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
