1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Riley | Jeep |
Model | Kestrel | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 80 L |