1967 Riley Kestrel vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Riley Kestrel | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Riley | Mazda |
Model | Kestrel | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 76 L |