1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2007 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2007 Volvo XC90 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 121 kg more than 2007 Volvo XC90.
Because 2007 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2007 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
| Model | Silver Shadow | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2921 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 1985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 72 L |
