1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 44 kg more than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | BMW |
| Model | Silver Shadow | X6 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1983 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 85 L |
