1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Chevrolet Optra
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Optra weights approximately 279 kg more than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Optra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Chevrolet Optra | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Optra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 2385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 60 L |
