1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Renault |
Model | Silver Shadow | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 50 L |