1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2011 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 699 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Cruze.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2011 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
Model | Silver Shadow | Cruze |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 59 L |