1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2012 BMW 760
To start off, 2012 BMW 760 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 760 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2012 BMW 760 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | BMW |
| Model | Silver Shadow | 760 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 5972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 541 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 2250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5212 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1479 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 82 L |
