1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2012 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2012 Ford Mondeo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 567 kg more than 2012 Ford Mondeo.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2012 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 223 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 1539 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 59 L |
