1967 Saab 99 vs. 2010 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Saab 99 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Stavic (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1967 Saab 99. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1967 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 853 kg more than 1967 Saab 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 SsangYong Stavic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Stavic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Stavic (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Saab 99. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Saab 99. 2010 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1967 Saab 99 has manual transmission. 1967 Saab 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Saab 99 | 2010 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Saab | SsangYong |
Model | 99 | Stavic |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1708 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 156 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |