1967 Seat 1500 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Seat 1500 (71 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Seat 1500 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Seat 1500 | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Seat | Smart |
| Model | 1500 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 63 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |
