1967 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Seat 1500 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Seat 1500 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Seat | Citroen |
Model | 1500 | C3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 72 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1158 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2470 mm |