1967 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 341 kg more than 1967 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Seat 1500 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Seat | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | 6 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2789 mm |