1967 Seat 600 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1967 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Seat 600. (48 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Seat 600 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Seat | Triumph |
Model | 600 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 48 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |