1967 Simca 1501 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Simca 1501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Simca 1501 would be higher. At 1,473 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Simca 1501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Simca 1501 (81 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Simca 1501 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1967 Simca 1501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Simca 1501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Simca 1501 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Simca | Ford |
Model | 1501 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1473 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |