1967 Skoda 1202 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1967 Skoda 1202. (42 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1967 Skoda 1202.
Because 2009 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Skoda 1202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Skoda 1202 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Skoda | Ford |
| Model | 1202 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 42 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |
