1967 Skoda Octavia vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Skoda Octavia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1967 Skoda Octavia. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1967 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1967 Skoda Octavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Skoda Octavia. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Skoda Octavia | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Skoda | Triumph |
Model | Octavia | 2000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |