1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 510 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Talbot |
| Model | Tiger | Baby |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 4738 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 3130 mm |
