1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1534 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Sunbeam | Cadillac |
Model | Tiger | Escalade |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Size | 4738 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 98 L |