1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 468 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Subaru |
| Model | Tiger | Outback |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
| Engine Size | 4738 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1608 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
