1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2011 Ford Explorer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Explorer (290 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Ford |
| Model | Tiger | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4738 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5006 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
