1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2011 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2011 Mercury Mariner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Mercury Mariner. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2011 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 375 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 2011 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Mercury |
| Model | Tiger | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4738 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4458 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1778 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 62 L |
