1967 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 430 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Sunbeam Tiger | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Sunbeam | Cadillac |
Model | Tiger | ATS |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4738 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |