1967 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1967 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Suzuki Fronte | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | Fronte | Epica |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 38 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 2700 mm |
