1967 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1967 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V50 (240 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Suzuki Fronte | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Fronte | V50 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 1560 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |