1967 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1373 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 562 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
Model | Fronte | XJ |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 38 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 82 L |