1967 Toyota Crown vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,597 cc, 1967 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Toyota Crown (98 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1967 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Toyota Crown | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Crown | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1400 cc |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |