1967 Toyota Crown vs. 2008 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2008 Holden Caprice is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Crown. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Toyota Crown | 2008 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Crown | Caprice |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |