1967 Toyota Crown vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,597 cc, 1967 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Crown. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Because 1967 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Toyota Crown | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Crown | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2199 cc |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 58 L |
