1967 Toyota Crown vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Crown. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Toyota Crown. (172 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Toyota Crown | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Toyota | Jaguar |
| Model | Crown | XF |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2253 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
