1967 Toyota Crown vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,597 cc, 1967 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Crown.
Because 1967 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Toyota Crown (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Toyota Crown | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Crown | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |