1967 Triumph 1300 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Triumph 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 277 kg more than 1967 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Triumph 1300 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | 1300 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |