1967 TVR Tuscan vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1967 TVR Tuscan. (229 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1967 TVR Tuscan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1241 kg more than 1967 TVR Tuscan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 TVR Tuscan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 TVR Tuscan | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | TVR | Volvo |
| Model | Tuscan | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2870 mm |
