1967 Vauxhall Viva vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Vauxhall Viva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Vauxhall Viva would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Vauxhall Viva. (69 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Vauxhall Viva.
Because 1967 Vauxhall Viva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Vauxhall Viva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Vauxhall Viva | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Vauxhall | Mazda |
Model | Viva | 3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1159 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2639 mm |