1967 Volvo P 1800 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1967 Volvo P 1800. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo P 1800.
Because 1967 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Volvo P 1800 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | P 1800 | Epica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1777 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |