1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (194 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Willys-Overland | Jaguar |
| Model | Aero-Willys 2600 | XF |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 194 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2908 mm |
