1967 Zastava 1500 vs. 2010 BMW 128
To start off, 2010 BMW 128 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 128 (230 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 128 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 128 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 128 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Zastava 1500 | 2010 BMW 128 | |
Make | Zastava | BMW |
Model | 1500 | 128 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 230 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2659 mm |