1967 Zastava 1500 vs. 2011 Ford Flex

To start off, 2011 Ford Flex is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Flex (262 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Flex weights approximately 1048 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500. 2011 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1967 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1967 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: