1967 Zastava 1500 vs. 2012 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 207 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Zastava 1500 | 2012 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Zastava | Peugeot |
| Model | 1500 | 207 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1397 mm |
