1967 Zastava 850 K vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 841 kg more than 1967 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Zastava 850 K | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Zastava | Jaguar |
Model | 850 K | XK |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2751 mm |