1967 ZAZ 966 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 27 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 52 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1967 ZAZ 966 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | ZAZ | ZAZ |
Model | 966 | 966 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 886 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 54.5 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2170 mm |