1968 Abarth 1300 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1968 Abarth 1300 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Abarth 1300 (124 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 340 kg more than 1968 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Abarth 1300. (131 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth 1300 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | FX |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2620 mm |
