1968 Abarth 1300 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1968 Abarth 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1968 Abarth 1300. (124 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1445 kg more than 1968 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth 1300 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 79 L |
