1968 Abarth 1300 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1968 Abarth 1300. (73 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1968 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1968 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth 1300 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3300 mm |
