1968 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Abarth 1300 (73 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 ZAZ Wagon weights approximately 75 kg more than 1968 Abarth 1300.
Because 1968 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth 1300 | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Abarth | ZAZ |
Model | 1300 | Wagon |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2330 mm |