1968 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1968 Abarth 1300. (73 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Abarth 1300 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Westfield |
| Model | 1300 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2320 mm |
